basten Posted January 7, 2004 Share Posted January 7, 2004 XeForce3 a ti znaesh li kak shte podkarash s toq FX izobshto HL2, shte go gledash kato komiks, strani4ka 1va, strani4ka 2ra... Kartite za koito govorish 4e mogat da se clock kato jivotni sa 5900 nagore(FX5900XT e pod 5900 da sme naqsno), koito struvat dovolni pari. I da kaja, zashto nVidiite sa po-burzi. 1) Premahvat 4ast ot obshtata rendirana plosht 2) Premahvat nadpisi i logota s cel po-burzo rendirane(sinteti4nite tests) 3) Ka4estvoto na rendiranata kartina(scena) e umishleno namaleno s cel po-burzo rendirane. E sled tezi optimizacii, prav si nqma kak ina4e da ne sa po-burzi ot suotvetnite im radeoni. Ama koi bi dal pari za neshto, koeto izkarva grozna kartina za 10-15 FPS pove4e ot krasotata na radeonite(9000 i 9200). Da ne govorim, 4e ako ti trqbva speed ti mojesh da si nstroish radeona da rendira to4no kakto i kartite na nVidia. I...O, iznenada...toi shtestane po-burz ot tqh. Moite ne si gi zasegnal za sq za men nVidia sa po-dobri v middle klasata s FX5900XT. Ne sam fanatiziran fan na Ati, interesuvame samo za kvi pari shte polu4a po-dobro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XeForce3 Posted January 7, 2004 Share Posted January 7, 2004 Dobre spored men FX 5200 e po dobyr ot RADEON 9000-9100-9200 Tova iskam da kaja. I izivnqvaite ako sym zasegnal nechii interesi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefan Posted January 7, 2004 Share Posted January 7, 2004 по добър защото "поддържа" дх9 ли ?Поддържа другия път.Единствената карта на нвидиа която е по-добра от съответното ати според мен е фх5950. фх5200 не струва,р9000/100/200 го бие както си иска,фх5600 е фх5200 с клокнати памети,а , чувам че с фх5700 не са се осрали чак толкова много нвидия.XeForce3 ти си стой с нвидиата и вади точки на бенчовете,ние с атитата ще поиграем игрите. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weasel Posted January 7, 2004 Share Posted January 7, 2004 specialno za xeforce:(molq da me izvinqt horata sys slabi syrca i niski resolucii) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XeForce3 Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 Priznavam kartinata naistina e dosta dobra. Obache kolko choveka imat takyv monitor kato tvoq? Za da si igraqt s takava razdelitelan sposobnost. Zashto ne spojish i snimka sys nVIDIA FX???? Za da vidim i s neq kak izglejda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender Posted January 8, 2004 Author Share Posted January 8, 2004 Trqbva da se priznae 4e sega Nvidia izvadiha super karta na super cena tova e FX5700 ultra koqto e po-dobra ot R9600XT i dvete karti sa na ceni okolo 200$. Lo6oto tuk vav foruma 4e otnovo se razgarq poznatiqt spor koi kogo?Ati ili Nvidia? Imam edin priqtel deto si kupi 2 vida FX5200 ediniq Ku4e marka a drugiq Soltek ot 95$ Darja q to4no 2 dena i kaza 4e sa po zle ot R9000.Posle doplati nqkoi lev i si kupi Ti4200.Pak ne be6e dovolen i di kupi Fx5600 256Mb na Albatron i sega nai nakraq mirqsa.Kaza 4e v novite igri s novite drivers 5600 e mnogo po-barz ot Ti4200.Za tova ako 6te vzimate ne6to okolo 120$ 5600 mai e nai uda4no,6toto R9600 se dani meko kazano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basten Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 Defender podoziram, 4e si sravnqval radeon9600 s orqzana shina s vaprosnite nVidia karti. 9600XT e po-dobar ot vaprosnite nVidii do 5700Ultra i sega shte ti kaja zashto. Poslednata go bie s malko kato skorost, tova e vqrno, no podrujkata i za directX 9 e super umrqla. Ti znaesh li kakvo stava kato se pusne sinteti4en test na directx9 s 5700Ultra? 60% ot testovete izobshto ne trugvat. Pri4inata shaders 2.0. Pusni gi s Radeona i gledai kak shte minat vsi4kite bez griji. Bil malko po-baven...e kvo mi puka sled kato eksploziite v HL2(i igri polzvashti negoviq engine) shte sa istinski, a ne "ala" bezbudjeten hollywoodski film. Za 200$ mojesh da si vzemesh FX5900XT, togava ve4e mojesh da govorish za zna4itelno po-golqma skorost, koeto vapreki 4e otnovo nqma shaders 2.0 bi te nakaralo da q kupish. PS: 5600 izobshto ne e konkurenciq na 9600 XT i fakt koito dokazva dumite mi e, 4e nVidia pusnaha oshte 2 karti(FX5700Ultra i FX5900XT) v sushtiq diapazon s nadejda da iztlaskat Ati ot liderskata poziciq v middle class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chochosan Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 9600 moje da se duni ako ne e pro ili xt versiqta ako neq si gledal hubavo, ama inache s 5700 sa na ravna proizvoditelnost pri po dobro kachestvo na Ati-to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender Posted January 9, 2004 Author Share Posted January 9, 2004 Abe pi4ove az sam varl fen na ATI ama ne mi govorete za po-dobro ka4estvo pri seriqta 9600 i tazi na 5700 Ultra ili na 5950.Idete v hardwarebg.com tam pi4ovete sa gi sravnili dori ima shotove i mi kajete koe mu e po-dobroto.Tva za sinteti4nite testove ne e mnogo vqrno 6toto o6te nqma zaglavie koeto e istinski DX9.i na edin test kakto znaete ne moje mnogo da se vqrva 6toto ako gleda6 nqkoi drugi testove Nvidia karti Radeona.Za men testovete sa v igrite.Men kato potrebitel me interesuva koq karta 6te dviji po-qko v nai komersialnite igri.Ako sa optimizirani za Ati 6te kupuvame ATI nezavisimo 4e 4ipovete na Nvidia sa po-savar6enni ili obratnoto vaji v sa6tata stepen A R9600 e dosta zle dori i sas 128 bitova shina (Vij Pro e druga klasa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basten Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Priqtel az govorq za XT(vav vsi4kite mi posts), koeto e po-burzo ot Pro versiqta. To ima 64 i 128 bita shina. Tova, 4e nqma igra ne zna4i, 4e ne moje da se pusne test na shaders 2.0, za da se ostanovi kak raboti. Pri nVidiite prosto ne raboti Az ti kazah 5700Ultra e po-burza, no nqma poddrujka na shaders 2.0...s edna duma skorostta i ka4estvoto na kartinata (obedinenie v edno) i sprqmo tazi na radeona ne struvat. Za FX5900XT(oshte po-malko za 5950, koqto e topmodela na nVidia za momenta) nikoi ne ti kazva, 4e e po-bavna. Naprotiv kazah ti, 4e e tolkova burza kato karta, 4e i bez poddrujkata na vaprosnite shaderi, zalojeni v directx9 pak e po-dobriq izbor kato karta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backbone Posted January 10, 2004 Share Posted January 10, 2004 Ne znam az sum sus ATI RADEON 8500 chip, 275MHz clock rate; 128MB DDR SGRAM memory in 8 Samsung 3.3ns microchips, 275 (550) MHz clock rate, 128-bit bus; Peak fill rate in the multitexturing mode is 1100 megapixels/sec and 2200 megatexels/sec. I vadi dosta po dobri pokazateli ot Fx5200 i Ati Radeon 9000/9200 na 3D Mark 2003 i Sisoft Sandra 2003 a puk e suvsem malko po-skupa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender Posted January 10, 2004 Author Share Posted January 10, 2004 4e te prodavat li se o6te? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backbone Posted January 10, 2004 Share Posted January 10, 2004 tezi s 128 bit 6ina i 128 ddr mb gi ima po magazinite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weasel Posted January 10, 2004 Share Posted January 10, 2004 tezi s 128 bit 6ina i 128 ddr mb gi ima po magazinite po koi magazini? az predi mesec tyrsih takova i ne namerih, daje r9000 nqmashe, zatova se sprqh na r9200 nakraq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backbone Posted January 10, 2004 Share Posted January 10, 2004 Moita e vzeta ot Sofia ot magazina na Compaq! a otnostno Radeon 9100\9200 sa bazirani na 8500 samo 4e s namelini Mhz Radeon 9100-250(500)mhz Radeon 9200SE-200(400)MHz dokato 8500 podleji na golqm overclock do 360(720)Mhz A na Defender mu preporu4vam ako si nameri 8500 da q vzeme a puk ako iska dobra video carta na niska cena Radeon 7500 230(360)Mhz s overclock do 320 core\540 memory Mhz Ima test s 3D Mark na http://www.digit-life.com/articles/radeon7...7500/index.html Edit: Ako mu se davat pove4e pari Ati Radeon 9600SE 400Mhz core\500Mhz memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weasel Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 a otnostno Radeon 9100\9200 sa bazirani na 8500 samo 4e s namelini MhzRadeon 9100-250(500)mhz Radeon 9200SE-200(400)MHz dokato 8500 podleji na golqm overclock do 360(720)Mhz Uf, qsno kolko si v chas... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGENT_ORANGE Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 FX 5200 ako si e zeme6 nema da zgre6i6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XeForce3 Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 Reshi li se veche kakva video karta shte si vzemish/vzel??? AKo si si e kupil posni malko rezoltati ot markove Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender Posted January 12, 2004 Author Share Posted January 12, 2004 Abe az ne sam kazal 4e 6te kupuvam obezatelno iskah da 4uq malko mneniq.Zna4i Radeon 8500 e izpalnenie 2x64 bitova 6ina koqto e po-dobra no i po-skapa ot 1x128bit.Tova e za va6e info.Nqkade bqh spomenal 4e prodadoh 1 8500 i horata doidoha 4ak ot SF i zatova se samnqvam 4e ima o6te takiva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backbone Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Tq be6e pusnata v malki koli4estva i be6e edna ot nai uspe6nite karti na Ati i zatova ne se u4udvam ako ne moje6 da q nameri6 nikude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender Posted January 12, 2004 Author Share Posted January 12, 2004 Ama az ne sam kazal 4e 6te kupuvam takava samo se interesuvah ima li o6te na pazara.Po-gore pisah 4e sam prodal 8500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.