Jorkis Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 Taka niakoi ima li idea kakvo ozna4ava tova: Malko golemi4ko stana, ama dano ne se surdite Ta kakvo ozna4ava tova Invalid field in parameter. Ne se pritesniavaite ot tova 4e e simulation. Prosto e taka zashtoto prednata ve4er precakah edin disk i reshih da simuliram purvo. Kakto vijdate opitvam se da napravia overburn no neshto ne se polu4i. Za purvi put se opitvam na moiata zapisva4ka NEC 24x ina4e do sega ne sum imal problemi s overburn na drugi zapisva4ki A kogato precakah diska napravih slednoto samo 4e togava niamashe simulation i napravo write. Zapisa filma no nakraia kogato triabvashe da zatvori ili ne znaia kakvo to4no da napravi mi izpisa Invalid field in parameter. Da ne bi dolnata 4erta pred NEC da burka neshto programata ne znaia ako niakoi ima predstava molia da kaje i da kaje zashto samo pri men vijdam tova 'disc at once/96' nikude drugade ne sum vijdal tova neshto, a helpa na nero kazva 4e tova e po-dobre dori ot 'disc at once' Kakvo stava Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LifeFeel Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 Ами почети сигурен съм, че NEC записвачките не подържат overburn... цъкни на Recorder->Choose Recorder и виж дали там пише срещу Overburn:Supported File->Preferences->Expert Features -> Maximum CD Length отговаря ли на това, което опитваш да запишеш ? После трябва да избереш Burn No Multisession DAO или DAO/96 Наистина ще съм благодарен ако някой каже какво е DAO/96 и по какво се различава от Disk at Once (без 96 ) от доста време се чудя и съм търсил информация и още не знам... NEC записвачките са гадни, или поне бяха ако са ги оправили... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDL Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 a mi ne znam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorkis Posted September 23, 2003 Author Share Posted September 23, 2003 DDL 'super' si LifeFeel az absolutno sushtia film go zapisvah na NEC 40x predi dva dena, na sushtata marka disk. Tova koeto mi go kazvash shte go napravia kato se pribera vkushti. Basi kusmeta zapisva4kata mi da ne poddurja overburn Do sega nikoga ne sum imal problem sus zapisva4kata, samo niakoi diskove ne gi zasi4a do maksimalnata skorost, no podobni diskove i TEAC naprimer ne gi zasi4a do maksimalnata im skorost. No interesnoto e 4e na DAO/96 trugna da zapisva i mislia 4e go zapisa, samo nakraia se naaka neshto. 4udia se ako mu dam to4no tolkova kolkoto kazva 4e shte e filma dali shte stane, imam vpredvid Nero mikazva 4e fila e 91:57:23, ako tova go napisha na overburn a ne 92 dali shte stane, ama pusto niama simulacia a puk ne mi se precakva oshte edin disk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 Наистина ще съм благодарен ако някой каже какво е DAO/96 и по какво се различава от Disk at Once (без 96 ) от доста време се чудя и съм търсил информация и още не знам... Виш тук. Преди време бях чел за Дао/96 там. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dj_ivo Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 I az imam su6tiq problem spokoino . i az sum s NEC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorkis Posted September 23, 2003 Author Share Posted September 23, 2003 Hubavo de ako NEC-a e vinoven niama li na4in da bude nakaran da pishe overburnig, s niakakvi draiveri ili s niakakuv dopulnitelen hardware znam li I zashto 40x NEC pishe a puk tozi neshte Edit: Spored Nero pisa4kata poddurja overburn, e sega ve4e me zastrelia Dali puk diska ne e vinoven?????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicko Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 DAO/96 e rejim na zapis pri koito software podawa na pisachkata oswen dannite i subchannel data-ta, a ne ostawia pisachkata da generira sama subchannel data kakto e w drugite rejimi. RAW-DAO 96 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 96 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. This is the best mode for CloneCD. It allows writing of all subchannel information, including Digital Signatures, CD-Text, ISRC, Catalog Numbers, CD+G, CD+Midi, Gaps, Indices and Crazy TOCs. RAW-DAO 94 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 94 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. Same as RAW-DAO 96, but 2-Bytes CRC of the Q Subchannel are generated by the writer. RAW-DAO 16 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 16 Bytes P-Q Subchannel Data. This is the second best mode for CloneCD. It allows writing of most subchannel information, including most Digital Signatures, ISRC, Catalog Numbers, Gaps, Indices and Crazy TOCs. 2-Bytes CRC of the Q Subchannel are generated by the writer. RAW-SAO = 2352 bytes RAW Data. This is the third best mode for CloneCD. Feature support is drive dependant. ISRC, Catalog Numbers and Indices can be written. Usually CD-Text, CD+G and CD+MIDI can be written as well. Crazy TOCs and Digital Signatures can't be written in this mode. SAO = 2352 bytes error corrected Data. This is the worst mode for CloneCD. Writing of ISRC, Catalog Numbers, Indices and usually CD-Text is supported. I az sum chuwal che NEC ne poddurjat overburn, no iawno se otnasia samo za opredeleni modeli : DAO/96 Mode is great!I got NEC NR-7800A burner with Dell computer and I couldn'd do overburn with the old mode. With DAO/96 mode overburning works!!! For the first time I could do overburns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igniter Posted October 4, 2003 Share Posted October 4, 2003 Hvarlete edin pogled naFeurio.com-ima info za vazmojnostite na dosta modeli pe4ki Ta az li4no sam mnogo dovolen ot moq NEC-9100A. 4at pat neroto se ebava s neq, ama vajnoto e 4e ne mi e skapala nito edin CD s neroto i clone cd. Sega mislq da probvam Feurio. Nqkoi da q e polzval? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien`s_Hell Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 4uval sam 4e znaka X uzna4ava 4e ti e izgorqla podlo6kata.Demek diska Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.